| Overview: In September 2003, the FCC announced that “dark fiber” transmission
services would no longer be eligible for E-rate discounts as of FY 2004. “Dark
fiber” was defined as “…fiber optic cable for which the service provider has
not provided modulating electronics…” (Note: “dark” fiber is not the same as
“unlit” fiber. “Unlit” means that the fiber is not being used; “dark” means
that the modulating electronics are provided by the user, not the carrier.)
As a result of this eligibility change, an E-rate applicant currently receiving
dark fiber services under a long-term contract must either convert the contract
to cover a lit fiber system, with the necessary modulating electronics being
provided (i.e., owned and maintained) by the carrier, or forego E-rate
discounts on the service beginning July 1, 2004.
To date, neither the FCC nor SLD has fully detailed the steps an applicant must
take to convert an ineligible dark fiber system to an eligible lit fiber
system. The two key questions are: (a) what is the minimum modulating
electronics that must be provided by the carrier; and (b), what procedures must
be followed to modify a contract?
In the absence of more formal instructions, this set of Frequently Asked
Questions is designed to provide preliminary guidance on the dark fiber
conversion process. It is based on a combination of formal and informal
information from the FCC and SLD, and on what we hope is good E-rate common
sense. Applicants should be aware that the conclusions expressed herein are
solely those of E-Rate Central. Applicants should continue to check
the SLD web site for future announcements on this subject.
|
-
What is the minimum configuration of “modulating electronics” that could be
provided by a carrier to assure that a fiber optic service would not be
considered an ineligible “dark fiber” system?
The FCC’s recently released Third Order (FCC 03-323) states:
“…it is appropriate to provide Priority One discounts on service provider
charges to recoup the cost of leasing optical equipment to light fiber, when
that optical equipment is the single basic terminating component of an
end-to-end network and it is necessary to provide an end-to-end
telecommunications or Internet access service.” [Paragraph 49]
The use of the phrase “single basic terminating component” suggests — but does
not explicitly say — that basic (and generally low cost) “TX to FX Converters”
(e.g., Cisco’s “GBICs”) would qualify as the minimum “modulating electronics.”
Pending FCC or SLD guidance to the contrary, applicants can assume that, if
such converters are provided by the service provider, the service will not be
deemed an ineligible “dark fiber” system.
In some manufacturers’ product lines, the TX to FX conversion function is
integrated into larger pieces of equipment. In this case, the first inline
piece of equipment interfacing with a fiber optic cable should be considered
the “modulating electronics.”
-
Can more than the minimum modulating electronic components be provided to an
applicant as a part of a carrier’s service?
Yes, but such additional equipment will be subject to the FCC’s Tennessee
Decision tests (i.e., it will not necessarily be considered part of a Priority
One service). Indeed, the following footnote in the FCC’s Third Order suggests
that additional equipment will be considered Priority Two:
“To the extent an applicant seeks to lease multiple terminating components, one
would be deemed eligible for funding as a Priority One service and the
remainder would be eligible for funding as Priority Two internal connections.”
[Footnote 91]
Discounts on Priority Two equipment, whether provided by a carrier or owned by
the applicant, are available only as Internal Connections services.
|
|