| New Methodology for Library Discount Rate
Calculations
Although the new Form 471 looks quite different from the older version, the only
substantive change is the calculation of discount rates for libraries. In the
past, an individual library site used the aggregate discount rate of the school
district in which it was located (i.e., the weighted average of the discount
rates of the individual school discount rates in that district).
Now, using a revised version of Block 4: Worksheet B, the same library would
calculate its discount rate directly off the discount rate matrix based on the
percentage of the total number of district students eligible for the National
School Lunch Program ("NSLP"). In this way, an individual urban library, for
example, would always have a "multiple of 10" discount rate (i.e., 20, 40, 50,
60, 80, or 90%) rather than some possible aggregate mid-band rate (e.g., 57%).
To determine the impact of this change, we did a preliminary discount rate
analysis for over 50 libraries located in one New York State county using last
year's NSLP data. The majority of the county's districts had consistent
discount rates among their individual schools, so the districts themselves had
"multiple of 10" aggregate rates. As expected, the new methodology resulted in
no change for the associated libraries.
However, about 35% of the 19 districts did not have "multiple of 10" aggregate
rates. Using the new calculation method, the discount rates for the associated
libraries all changed to higher or lower "multiple of 10" rates. About half
went up and half went down. As a general (but not perfect) rule, if the
district's aggregate rate was more than halfway to the next highest "multiple
of 10," the library's rate went up to that multiple -- and vice versa.
The most significant swings were near the top and the bottom of the discount
rate range. One library in a 32% district dropped to 20% - a drop in E-rate
benefits of more than one-third. On the other hand, libraries in districts with
aggregate rates in the mid- to upper-80s could go up to 90% - an important
difference if Internal Connection services are funded at 90% but not at mid-80%
levels.
SPIN Change Clarification - Need for Vendor Caution
When the SLD approves a mid-year SPIN change, after some funds have been
authorized for disbursement to the original service provider, only the
remaining funds will be available for disbursement to the new provider. Quite
logically, total funding to both suppliers cannot exceed the original committed
amount.
Unfortunately, the SLD's system of notifying a new vendor of a successful SPIN
change apparently does not show a reduction in the committed amount to reflect
previous disbursements. A recent SPIN change confirmation notice indicated the
following:
"The new Service provider will receive a Funding Commitment Decision Letter
(FCDL). PLEASE NOTE: While this FCDL will contain more detailed information on
the FRN listed above, it will show the ORIGINAL COMMITMENT amount, rather than
the amount that remains undisbursed for this FRN."
New vendors - particularly those discounting their customers' bills - should be
careful not to approve discounts in excess of the remaining commitments so as
to avoid the need for future billing adjustments. Vendors can check remaining
commitments on specific FRNs by contacting the SLD's invoicing group or by
using the Data Request database capability on the SLD's Web site.
|