E-Rate Central
E-Rate Central Home E-Rate Application Tips E-rate Forms Rack E-rate National and State Specific Information E-rate Service Provider Information E-rate Archives: News, Bulletins, CIPA, FCC, Terminology, Code9 Contact Us
Sort by:
date
relevancy
Help

 

Ten Audit Tips
Ten Rules for E-Rate Success
Tech Plan
Form 470
Competitive
Bid Response
Documentation
Form 471
Form 472
Form 486
Form 500
Checklist
FCDL
Discount Rate Optimization
Contract
Timing Issues
RALs
Appeals

 

Receive the
E-rate Weekly
Newsletter

 

 
Funding Commitment Decision Letters
<< Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | Next >>
Review Items in FCDLs:

Important Warning: The most serious problem found by E-Rate Central in its review of FCDLs is that a decision was not included for every single request on the associated Form 471. Whether the requested item was funded or denied, there should be a one-to-one correspondence between the applicant's requested items and the SLD decisions. If there is a mismatch, there is an error.

This table illustrates the key information included in a FCDL (covering a single decision for a funded discount):

Funding Request Number: ########## .

Funding Status: Funded .

SPIN: 1430##### .

Service Provider Name: Acme Telephone .

Services Ordered: Telecommunications Services .

Earliest Possible Effective Date of Discount: 07/01/2005 .

Contract Expiration Date: 06/30/2006 .

Site Identifier: #######.

Billing Account Number: ### ###-####.

Pre-discount Amount: $ 2,000 .

Discount Percentage Approved by SLD: 40% .

Funding Commitment Decision: $ 800.00 - 471 Approved as submitted.

Almost every line of this decision is important; most need to be carefully compared with the related line item data on the original Form 471.

<< Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | Next >>